FAA: Our cell phone rule is not changing 
Airline passengers are getting a temporary reprieve from those who wish to introduce  in-flight cell phone 
service on U.S. airlines. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has said it's considering lifting 
its current ban on using cell phones in the air, but the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) doesn't 
appear interested, reports The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (free registration). "Let me be clear: 
Regardless of the FCC proceeding, the FAA's rules will remain," the FAA's Nicholas Sabatini said at a 
House aviation subcommittee hearing into the use of cell phones and other wireless devices on 
commercial airline flights. But, Sabatini wouldn't rule out a change in the future. "If an air carrier has met 
our safety requirements, the carrier may permit such use" on a case-by-case basis, he said. Meanwhile, 
if such devices are ultimately permitted in flight, federal law enforcement officials want to tap into the 
communications to monitor for suspicious e-mail, according to USA TODAY. Justice Department officials 
testified they're concerned terrorists could use air-to-ground cell or broadband service to launch attacks, 
or that wireless service could be used to detonate a bomb aboard an airliner.
 
   
  
 
  
Blow gun, bullwhip and power saws turn up
Here's a good find from the seemingly unending subject of "crazy things people try to get  tried to carry 
on a blowgun with darts and a bullwhip. Both items were brought to security on the same day, reports 
The Cleveland Plain Dealer, which adds that "for every blowgun confiscated at airport security 
checkpoints, thousands of butane lighters are surrendered; for every bullwhip, there are buckets of 
penknives." In  addition to the 18,850 lighters confiscated at Cleveland so far this  year, airport security 
there also has taken possession of 2,780  tools "such as screwdrivers, hatchets and, yes, power saws,"  
according to a list compiled by The Plain Dealer. Most offending  travelers aren't bent on malicious 
behavior, says the TSA's Rick DeChant, who supervises screening operations at the Ohio airports of 
Cleveland, Akron-Canton, Toledo and Youngstown. Despite post-9/11 publicity about airport security 
rules, he says most passengers aren't familiar with the rules, or they simply forget they're  carrying 
forbidden items. 
                                
  
   
  
 
Fliers beware of the 'outhouse seat' 
The worst seat on an airplane may not actually be a middle seat, nor the seats in the back of the plane. In 
fact, this seat is reputedly so bad it's become something of an urban legend — though this legend seems to 
be true. The seat in question is seat 29E on a particular  Continental Airlines flight, a seat about which one 
passenger wrote an angry letter — complete with illustrations — to the airline. The gripe? The flier claims 
the seat was located directly across from the jet's lavatory, something that subjected him to all kinds of 
unpleasantries. "Is it the stench of the sanitation fluid that is blown all over my body every 60 seconds when 
the door opens? Is it the whoosh of the constant flushing? Or is it the [passengers' rear ends] that seem to 
fit into my personal space like a pornographic jigsaw puzzle," the disgruntled passenger writes about his 
Dec. 21  flight from San Diego to Houston. The flier battled the bathroom crowd by erecting what he called 
a "stink shield," a blanket hung from the overhead luggage bin to  separate him from the lavatory. By now, 
you may have heard of this man's letter of complaint, which has been widely circulating on the Internet and 
was subject to urban-legend "truth-squadding" by Snopes.com. Some frequent fliers have also been 
speculating about the letter in online forums, with some suggesting that either the seat in question does not 
exist — or that perhaps the disgruntled flier wrote the wrong seat number. But, today, the letter is the subject 
of Keith L. Alexander's "Business Class" column in The Washington Post. A Continental spokesman told  
Alexander that the airline contacted the aggrieved flier to  apologize. "If there were a quick and easy 
solution to his concern,  we would do it in a whiz," the spokesman tells Alexander.  "Notwithstanding the 
embellished humor in the letter, we don't pooh-pooh any of our customers' concerns, and have apologized."  
Other passengers have taken notice. Ana Luisa Aldana, a San Francisco management consultant, tells 
Alexander that she checks seatguru.com before a flight to make sure she doesn't get stuck in the
"outhouse seat." 
 
   
  
 
1 |
 2 |
 3 |
  4 |
 5 |
 6 |
 7 |
 8 |
 9 |
 10 |
 11 |
 12
BRATS Home Page